By Elizabeth Bishop. Brought to my attention by, of all things, the New York Times. Idk if this is a regular thing by the Times, unpacking a poem. This is the first time I’ve seen it. I’ve read this one before and reeled from the walloping last paragraph. I’ve spent time wondering who/what/how. The simplicity and perfection when you gently nod along in resonance and wondering what’s the reason behind the poem and the sudden pain that squeezes your heart at the end and you have the answer, it is beautiful. I cried at the end, I’m sure I cried when I read it before too. This reaction feels so intimate and personal, yet so many feel this exact same emotion on reading it and the Times chooses to profile it. I want to share my (re)discovery with someone, I’m worried their reaction will not be the same as mine and detract from my joy in it. Here it is for me to (re)discover later:
The art of losing isn’t hard to master;
so many things seem filled with the intent
to be lost that their loss is no disaster.
Lose something every day. Accept the fluster
of lost door keys, the hour badly spent.
The art of losing isn’t hard to master.
Then practice losing farther, losing faster:
places, and names, and where it was you meant
to travel. None of these will bring disaster.
I lost my mother’s watch. And look! my last, or
next-to-last, of three loved houses went.
The art of losing isn’t hard to master.
I lost two cities, lovely ones. And, vaster,
some realms I owned, two rivers, a continent.
I miss them, but it wasn’t a disaster.
—Even losing you (the joking voice, a gesture
I love) I shan’t have lied. It’s evident
the art of losing’s not too hard to master
though it may look like (Write it!) like disaster.
The Times also broke it down. It’s a villanelle poem, I believe. 19 lines, 3*5 + 4. Repeating phrases like an incantation, the position of the phrases is set. I go through the poem like this:
1st para – hmm, yes
2nd para – yes, esp the hour badly spent
3rd para – does she mean memories? Perhaps avenues closing as you grow older?
4th para – She had to sell her place to get some money? moved away?
5th para – yes, definitely moved away. The realm business must be hyperbole
6th – oh! just helplessly oh!
The Times gave a few hints on the devices in the last para, the – in the beginning, shan’t, too and the parentheticals.
Bishop wrote at least 15 drafts, massaging it as each step to produce this perfection. It looks like it rolled out of her pen, fully formed. Hard work, my love, it can’t be faked
Read Full Post »